Thursday, January 26, 2017

Fiduciary Duty

Here is another bit if information/education for us on my investigative quest. Again, this is still primarily US based, unless noted, at this time.

A fiduciary duty is the highest standard of care.  The person who has a fiduciary duty is called the fiduciary, and the person to whom he owes the duty, is typically referred to as the principal or the beneficiary. If an individual breaches the fiduciary duties, he or she would need to account for the ill-gotten profit. His or her beneficiaries are entitled to damages, even if they suffered no harm. 


1. Corporations and Fiduciary Duty

In discussing corporate fiduciary duties, it is very helpful to refer to the corporate law of Delaware. More than half of publicly traded companies are incorporated in Delaware.  Nonetheless, corporations incorporated in other states (ed.: or Countries) may be bound by different rules and obligations.  (BrewBot has/had a US based company or operating corporation but as of yet, I've not been able to find accurate filing information beyond a cold trail in Texas.)
Directors of corporations, in fulfilling their managerial responsibilities, are charged with certain fiduciary duties.  The primary duties are the duty of care and the duty of loyalty.
  • Duty of Care: This duty requires that directors inform themselves “prior to making a business decision, of all material information reasonably available to them.”  Whether the directors were informed of all material information depends on the quality of the information, the advice available, and whether the directors had “sufficient opportunity to acquire knowledge concerning the problem before action.”  Moreover, a director may not simply accept the information presented.  Rather, the director must assess the information with a “critical eye,” so as to protect the interests of the corporations and its stockholders. (Per filings, Chris McClelland is the sole Director of BrewBot)
     
  • Duty of Loyalty: As the Delaware Supreme Court explained in Guth v. Loft, 5 A.2d 503, 510 (Del. 1939): “Corporate officers and directors are not permitted to use their position of trust and confidence to further their private interests. . . . A public policy, existing through the years, and derived from a profound knowledge of human characteristics and motives, has established a rule that demands of a corporate officer or director, peremptorily and inexorably, the most scrupulous observance of his duty, not only affirmatively to protect the interests of the corporation committed to his charge, but to refrain from doing anything that would work injury to the corporation, or to deprive it of profit or advantage which his skill and ability might properly bring to it, or to enable it to make in the reasonable and lawful exercise of its power.”
Additionally, courts have imposed the following duties:
  • Duty of Good Faith: Requiring the director to advance interests of the corporation, not violate the law, and fulfill his or her duties.  For a thorough discussion of this duty, see In re The Walt Disney Co. Derivative Litig., 906 A.2d 27 (Del. 2006).
     
  • Duty of Confidentiality: Required directors to keep corporate information confidential and not disclose it for their own benefit.  Consult Guth v. Loft, Inc., 5 A.2d 503 (Del. 1939) for more information.
     
  • Duty of Prudence: Requires a trustee to administer a trust with a degree of care, skill, and caution that a prudent trustee would exercise.  Consult Amgen Inc. v. Harris, 136 S. Ct. 758 (2016) for more information.
     
  • Duty of Disclosure: This duty requires directors to act with “complete candor.”  In certain circumstances, this requires the directors to disclose to the stockholders “all of the facts and circumstances” relevant to the directors’ decision.
These duties do not mean, however, that the court will always impose its own review over directors’ decisions.  Under the “business judgment rule” the court presumes “that in making a business decision the directors of a corporation acted in an informed basis, in good faith and in the honest belief that the actions taken was in the bests interests of the company.”  Under this rule, courts will generally refrain from questioning the directors’ judgment so long as their judgment can be attributed to some rational corporate purpose.

How do the Laws in Belfast differ? Still researching the similarities and differences...keep watching the blog for further updates.

Thursday, January 19, 2017

Misc Items

FYI - Chris posted on the BrewBot forums yesterday:
Thanks for the comments.
  1. 3rd February is realistic. January 31 is a deadline for a funding conversation and should know more about a couple of other options.
  2. The two SF units are being reviewed by mid-week. From there we will know what needs to be done. Need to allow weeks.
  3. Yes we can build these, we have not run out of options.
Any other questions let me know.
Thanks,
Chris



I've been looking into Kickstarter and foreign currency fluctuations.  A graph that shows the "value" of the GBP versus USD since the Kickstarter campaign has ended.

Tuesday, January 17, 2017

Nothing until 31 Jan?

Several of us have posted replies and questions to Chris on his 14 Jan update in the forum.


Unfortunately, we've received no response to these questions. Will Chris "disappear" until after the 31st? This has been the previous pattern.


Engaging with the forum/customer base is not only good business, it is also common decency. Even if further information is not shared, it shows that you are still there.


I'm still working on the timeline and if you've had any direct communications with BrewBot staff regarding status, progress, etc. please forward that information.

UPDATE: Per a note from Chris we should expect to have an update by the end of this week regarding his comments about 31 Jan. Will cross post any update he provides on the Brewbot forums here. I will also have a blog entry posted next week regarding my nearly daily private interactions with Chris that began in November of last year and prompted the creation of this blog.

Saturday, January 14, 2017

BrewBot Update from Chris 14 Jan 2017

For those of you following the progress of this blog and may not have access to the BrewBot forum, Chris did post an update titled Jan 14th - Update.


It is reprinted here without editorial comment:
     


Hey all,
It’s been really tough but I’m not walking away from this.
Fundraising
We are still fundraising for the production of the machine. This is necessary to produce machines. We are discussing seed investment and strategic opportunities. There has also been new momentum after the holiday period. We cannot share any further details about these discussions as they are confidential.
Product
There have been no further hardware iterations. The contract manufacturer will do some minor changes when we kick off production. We encountered firmware issues with one of the machines and will be addressing that as an update.
Shipping
There are two machines in San Francisco that we are hoping to send out within the bay area to backers. They need to be calibrated and tested before this happens.
Bar
To reiterate, no funds from Kickstarter were used for the bar. The bar has been a lifeline. It maybe able to fund production at some stage but that would need attention and some investment.
Next
The next significant date for us is the 31st January. There will be an update shortly after that date.
Finally
As many of you say it is black and white at the moment, we need funding to produce. There are a lot of people gunning for us and we appreciate the support, this buoys us through difficult times and will help drive us to a positive result.
Thanks as always,
Chris

Friday, January 13, 2017

BrewBot LTD Company Filing

While digging around in my continued research, I was able to view and pull the 2014/2015 financial statements filed on 12 August 2016 with Companies House.

They do represent a company with limited resources and potential concerns as an on going business.

Take a look and make your own judgement.

An Open Offer to BrewBot

Fairly recent news here...

http://www.irishnews.com/business/2016/12/13/news/fears-for-jobs-at-innovative-beer-company-brewbot-as-liabilities-rack-up-833544/

Chris or anyone from BrewBot...email me a response and I will post it.

Broken BrewBot Promise (Again)!

Here in the US we have a phrase called "Kick the Can". It refers to a situation where you are walking down the street and come across a BrewBot beer can discarded on the road. You have some choices, you can ignore it, pick it up and take care of the situation, or kick the can down the road. As you continue to walk you continue to kick the can in front of you so you don't actually do anything productive with this can - except maybe make some noise!

BrewBot, and specifically Chris McClelland the CEO, scheduled a Town Hall discussion for 12 Jan. 2017 at 5pm GMT. This was possibly in response to the visibility and actions of this blog/group (we can hope!).

A few short hours prior to the meeting, Chris posted on the BrewBot.io forum:
Hi all,
Based on some feedback and advice, we are not going to do a town hall meeting today however we will have an update for you all tomorrow.
Thank you,
Chris

Okay, fair enough, we will wait another day. However, as I post this, it is now after business hours in Belfast and there have been no updates provided on the forum.

Unfortunately, this is the same behavior experienced by the BrewBot backers time and time again. We are promised an update and no communication arrives.

All we are asking is for BrewBot to stop kicking the can; pick it up and give us something fact based and real.

The quest for answers continues.